A Modest Proposal for the Champions of Ketuanan Melayu
M. Bakri Musa
Second of Three Parts: Molding Our Students
[In
Part One I suggested that our current obsession with the presumed
deficiencies of our race and our undisguised resentment over the
successes of others are but expressions of frus (frustration)
and fury for our own lack of competitiveness and productivity. We should
focus instead on remedying both, and begin with our young, especially
those promising ones at our SBPs.]
It may seem
obvious but needs to be stated explicitly: We must prepare these
students for top universities the moment they step foot at a SBP. That’s
how they do it elsewhere. American students aspiring to top
universities begin their preparation upon entering high school, or even
earlier. The courses they take, their extra-curricular programs as well
as their summer activities are all geared towards this central mission.
My grandchildren who are in an American school in Singapore have
assigned reading lists for the summer, and they are still in primary
school! Likewise, SBP students must have mandatory reading lists and
writing assignments during their long holidays. The purpose is two-fold.
One is to prevent attrition of knowledge and study skills during the
long hiatus, and the other, to inculcate the habit of reading and
writing. It impresses upon them that those skills are not just for
examinations.
Once when I took my
family on an overseas trip, my son’s teacher asked him to keep a journal
to be shared with his class while my daughter was assigned to study a
Malay folk tale. In high school my son was invited to spend his summer
break at Ames Research Center.
I speak
with some experience. When my daughter entered Harvard Law School over
15 years ago, she was the first Malaysian to enroll there. There has not
been another since. One of my sons works for an agency that prepares
students for selective universities.
We should prepare all
SBP students for recognized matriculation examinations like IB,
American AP, or British “A” level, and start them from day one.
Consequently it would serve no purpose for them to sit for SRP and SPM.
Those tests have little predictive value anyway; their philosophy and
assumptions are also very different.
Since these students have limited English proficiency coming as they are
from the national stream, why not have their first year at SBP be full
English-immersion akin to the Special Malay or “Remove” Classes of yore?
Better yet, make all SBPs English-medium. That however, is no panacea.
MARA already has a few English-medium SBPs but their students’
achievements remain disappointing. We need to do more.
I envisage admitting the students in the middle of their Form II
instead of Form I, as at present, based on their SRP scores as well as
their Form I and first term of Form II performances. By the time they
sit for their IB or “A” level five years later, their cohorts in the
regular school would be in the middle of their Upper Six.
Their college counseling should start right away, as with preparing for
their PSAT and SAT. There must be adequate resources and personnel to
guide these students in their college choices, but more on that later.
Daewon’s and Minjuk’s excellent results were skewed because their
students were children of diplomats, expatriates, and others who had
been educated in the West. The South Korean government has since changed
the rule to make those schools liberalize their admissions. For SBPs I
suggest that they reserve half their slots for those who would be the
first in their family to enter university and those from the kampongs.
No matter how stringent the selection process, inevitably there will a
few who would not thrive in the residential school environment. While
every attempt should be made to help them, but if they do not measure
up, then they should be returned to regular schools. They are not
failures rather they are better suited for day school.
Three features of the Korean schools are worth emulating. First is the
mentoring system where first-year students are paired with a senior.
Second, those students are constantly exposed to successful role models,
fellow Koreans as well as non-Koreans who are graduates of top
universities. Those students get first-hand perspectives beyond what
could be gleaned from the college brochures. Likewise, our SBPs should
invite Malaysians who are graduates of top universities to give talks to
and inspire these students.
The third
striking feature is that the students’ time is structured during their
entire waking hours. They are always involved in something, if not with
their classes and class assignments then debates, sports, music, and a
myriad of extra-curricular activities. When students are occupied, they
are less likely to get into trouble.
MCKK obtained excellent results during the time of Principal Howell when
he instituted daily afternoon “preps” in addition to the evening ones.
When you have high expectations and demand more from your students, they
respond.
The converse is even more
consequential. If you have low expectations or reward those who do not
strive, as with sending them to third-rate universities abroad, then you
are imparting the wrong message. That would be akin to membajakan (adding fertilizer) lallang. Even without the extra help, those weeds would snuff out the lengkuas. In a rentier economy, we are busy fertilizing our lallang.
MARA is membajakan lallang
by sending hundreds of its students to third-rate universities abroad.
The money could be better spent to strengthen its matriculation programs
and SBPs at home. MARA should adopt tougher standards and send only
those who have been accepted to top universities. Currently it sends
students abroad even for sixth form. It is cheaper and far more
effective to prepare those students in Malaysia. MARA’s current policy
only perpetuates this culture of mediocrity.
Next Week: Last of Three Parts: Leveraging Residential Schools
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home