Political Versus Mental Merdeka (Independence)
M. Bakri Musa
www.bakrimusa.com
Much has changed in the world since 1957 when Malaysia
achieved its Merdeka (independence), with the pace ever accelerating. Great Britain
is no longer great, and the Austins and Morris Minors that used to ply
Malaysian roads are today found if at all only in the junkyards and collectors’
garages.
The social
landscape too has changed. The Lake Club, a cool oasis in the heart of humid
bustling Kuala Lumpur, was once the bastion of colonial privilege where British
miners, planters and civil servants retired during the heat of the day to enjoy
their stengahs (stouts) and steak,
uninterrupted by the offensive sights of the natives spitting on the ground,
Chinese maids grunting to clear their throats, and Indian laborers incessantly
squirting blood-like betel nut juice through their rotten teeth. Those disgusting
and unsanitary habits of the non-colonials could spoil one’s appetite in very short
order regardless of the physical ambience.
The staid
upscale Robinson Department Store was then thriving despite its lack of
customers, at least the native variety. Exclusiveness equaled profitability, a
concept that is still being aggressively pursued by today’s advertisers in
their endless search for lucrative niches. For Robinson, there was little need
to cater to the natives; they did not have the money anyway. The few wealthy ones
spotted inspecting the store’s merchandise were only too happy to pay the
exorbitant prices for the privilege of rubbing shoulders however briefly with
their colonial counterparts. For the store, that was an opportunity to jack up
the prices and rake in the profits. Then, as now, there was always money to be
made catering to people’s vanity, up to a point.
During a
recent visit to Malaysia, I had difficulty finding the old Robinson store. I
mean of course the building, as the company itself had long ago disappeared, a
casualty of Schumpeter’s creative destruction. As for an evening at the Lake
Club, the food–even the Malay cuisines–was way below par compared to those
found at the many luxury hotels now in KL. As in those hotels, the Malay food at
Lake Club was prepared and served by non-Malays or even non-Malaysians. As for
ambience, those foreign hotels are much more luxurious or “exclusive.”
Tourists
cannot be faulted for being impressed with Malaysia, especially upon arrival at
its gleaming Sepang Airport. At Customs and Immigration, polite
English-speaking officials would be there to greet them.
That was
not always the case. There was a time when the two departments would, to put it
kindly, serve as a good introduction to the country. The negligent services
were matched only by the tidak apa
(lackadaisical) personnel. Since then, frequent comparisons with the efficient
operation at the neighboring Singapore airport, only 30 minutes flying time
away, had embarrassed the officials sufficiently into making the necessary
improvements.
That is the
good news; Malaysians are capable of learning when sufficiently shamed. The bad
news is that comparisons with the definitely First World Singapore would rattle
most Malaysians, especially the leaders.
When
visiting Malaysia, I too like to play tourist, at least for the first few days to
ease my transition. There is no point complicating the inevitable jet lag with
routines that I have long forgotten, or giving up comforts I have grown
accustomed. Once I have recovered, and with the old Malaysian smell and
ambience slowly creeping back to re-excite the neurons in the deep recesses of
my memory, I yearn to return to the familiar Malaysian ways.
Then I would
return to my old village. There, time seems to have remained frozen. This is
true of rural Malaysia generally. If there is any change, it is for the worse.
Whereas in my youth I had to wait listlessly under the blazing sun for the
erratic village bus, today even that service is gone. As for schools, in my
time teachers were highly regarded and more than adequately compensated; today
the profession is inundated by the bonded and unemployable.
True,
during my youth education was a privilege enjoyed by far too few. However, why
do we always have to choose between quantity and quality? Strive for both!
Thomas
Wolfe’s “you can’t go home again” obviously does not apply to me. When I go
back to my village I am indeed returning home and to the time of my youth.
Chatting with the old villagers immediately confirms that. It can be unnerving.
Sometimes I wonder whether the time I was in medical school and living in North
America had just been a dream; awakened, I am back in the drudgery of my
kampong life. Only the presence of my wife beside me reassures me otherwise.
In many
respects life is now worse for today’s kampong youngsters. At least when I was
young I could dream that if I did well in my studies I could escape. Today,
even that aspiration is beyond contemplation for most. They may excel in
school, but their limited English skills would confine their opportunities and
any chance at upward mobility.
There have
been many development initiatives introduced over the years, as our politicians
constantly remind us, and they all carry exorbitant price tags. Yet for far too
many of the villagers and their children–the next generation–life remains
unchanged.
It is time
for a radical change in approach. Instead of emphasizing the physical aspects
of development–freeways, gleaming skyscrapers, and billion-ringgit GLCs–we
should focus on changing mindsets, on liberating them. Malays have been longing
for a free mind for far too long.
Consider
that we had to agitate and at times resort to violence to get our political merdeka; the British did not acquiesce readily
or enthusiastically. As for our minda
merdeka (free mind), expect even greater obstacles. No one can grant us
that; we have to strive for it ourselves, collectively and individually.
It is not
in the nature of humans to be cooped under the coconut shell. That is not
Allah’s grand design; He wants us to be free so we can undertake our
responsibilities as His vice-regents in this universe.
There are
only two options. One is the default setting, meaning, we do nothing but wait
passively. If we were to do that, we would reduce ourselves to being victims of
circumstances. Rest assured, eventually outside events will topple our shell, as has happened before with the Japanese
Occupation. Then ready or not, we were flung out onto the outside world. Though
we benefited from the change, the collateral damage was unpredictable and at
times unbearable.
The better
alternative is to topple our coconut shell on our own. That way we could choose
the timing and method, thus minimizing possible collateral damages. Doing so
would also empower our people and help create the results we desire.
Next: Toppling Our Coconut Shell
Adapted from the author’s book, Liberating The Malay Mind,
published by ZI Publications, Petaling Jaya, 2013. The second edition was
released in January 2016.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home