Malaysian Education: Deficiency
of Ambience
M. Bakri Musa
www.bakrimusa.com
One crippling deficiency of Malaysian
educational institutions is its ambience, or to be specific, enrollment.
Step
into any Malaysian classroom and one is struck by something odd. While Malaysia
is a plural society, its classrooms are segregated along race. Worse, this is voluntary.
National schools are fast becoming exclusively Malay, non-Malay enrollment
rapidly declining. Vernacular schools are almost exclusively non-Malays, though
there is recent rapid increase in Malay enrollment at Chinese schools.
The
growth is with international schools, in particular English-medium ones, with the
demand far outstripping the supply despite the much higher costs. If not for that
and rigid quotas, those schools would be inundated with Malaysians. Because of
the high costs, enrollment in these schools is skewed along race and
socioeconomic lines. Those foreign children at these schools (and their parents)
thus have a distorted view of local society.
The
growth in international schools reflects citizens’ low confidence in the local
system.
What
discourages non-Malays to enroll in national schools is the increasing
“Islamization” of the curriculum and environment. Islam is taught not as an
academic subject but as theology, with heavy emphasis on rituals and
catechisms. Even if non- Muslims wanted to learn Islam as a legitimate
intellectual pursuit, they would be put off. Granted, many Christian schools in
the West too have heavy religious components, as with attending mass,
nonetheless their curriculum is much broader and of higher quality.
Consequently, many non-Christian parents have no qualms enrolling their
children.
If
the “Islamization” of national schools does not deter non-Malays, then the quality
would, from the teaching and curriculum to the general level of discipline. Bullying,
gang activities, and drug abuse are the norms. The physical facilities are
shoddy, posing hazards to the students, as with halls and laboratories
collapsing soon after being completed. Food poisoning is a regular affliction,
reflecting the atrocious standard of hygiene in school canteens. National schools
do not inspire confidence.
Concerns
about “Islamization” and the deteriorating quality may be the initial reasons
for non-Malays to shun national schools, but this being Malaysia, the ugly
racial element is not far behind. Today, Malay-medium and Malay control are
equated with mediocrity, incompetence, and corruption in schools and
universities as well as other institutions. That poisons race relations.
Malaysia
is not leveraging her cultural diversity and ethnic plurality to enhance the learning
experiences of her students. Myopic Malaysian leaders consider diversity a
liability, not an asset. Malaysian schools and
universities reinforce the insularity of their students; these institutions,
especially religious, entrap not liberate young minds.
Segregation can be solved in two ways–mandatory and voluntary. The former
is cheap and can be effective, but whether sustainable is an open question.
What happens when the compulsive element is removed, as ultimately it would
have to be? The old segregated pattern would then return, and with a vengeance.
That
approach however, has merits. The American military is the most integrated of their
institutions, more so than universities or the sports and entertainment
industry. The military approaches the problem frontally and coercively. The
Joint Chief issued a command that all units be integrated. That was it;
everyone had to obey. A southern white boy would just have to adjust to the
fact that he had to stop and salute to a Black officer and address him as
“Sir!” Disobey, and he would be court-martialed. Simple and effective!
Yugoslavia’s
Tito did it that way. There was no ethnic cleansing during his time. There was stability
and peace that survived his death, albeit briefly. Sarajevo even hosted the
glittering winter Olympics of 1984.
We
may flinch at Tito’s authoritarian ways, but there was no questioning their
effectiveness. The problem was just that; when he was gone, old prejudices and
hatreds returned with a vengeance.
What
would have happened had the lid been kept on even tighter? Yugoslavia’s disintegration
would have been delayed, and if delayed long enough people might get used to
each other. They would have acquired the peace habits and forget their
destructive ancient ethnic hatreds.
Lester
Pearson, Nobel Peace Laureate and former Canadian Prime Minister, once said
that if he could keep Canadians out of war for just one generation, that would immunize
them against war. There is great wisdom to that. The contrary observation is
even truer; once a nation initiates war, it reduces the threshold for the next
one. That is where America is today.
I
am no fan of coercive methods to achieve social goals no matter how noble and
worthy. However, if they prove successful, I would not condemn them either.
American
public schools were once shining examples of social integration, acculturating
millions of children of immigrants to the American way. That is less so today.
More
relevant to contemporary Malaysia would be the old colonial English schools,
credited with producing many enlightened Malaysian leaders. Those schools attracted
Malaysians of all races, though for a variety of reasons, fewer Malays.
Some
advocate the return of those schools. I agree, up to a point. If we were to resurrect
those institutions in their original form without any modification, then we
would be no further ahead. We would be trading one set of problems for another.
The
biggest deficiency with the old English schools was their inability to attract Malays.
Unless that is rectified, these schools would aggravate interracial inequities. One strategy to make these schools attractive to Malays would be to have
them in the kampongs and small towns. The need to improve English
fluency is also the most acute there.
The
other major deficiency was that those old English schools paid little
sensitivity to local culture and environment. While I learned much about
daffodils in spring in Wordsworth’s Lake District, I was taught nothing about
our striking flame-of-the-forest trees or the rich biodiversity of our mangrove
swamps.
As
for respecting our national language, Malay was not introduced as a subject
until I was midway through my secondary school, and that was only because the
country had by then gained independence. As for deference to Islam, I was deep
in my science labs on Fridays during congregational prayer time.
Malay
parents adapted to those deficiencies. Bless them!
Those
deficiencies can be corrected; they should not be the excuse for not bringing
back English schools. We could make Malay and Islam compulsory subjects, or
better yet, teach Islam in English and as an academic subject. These
enhancements would not discourage non-Malays from enrolling, thus fulfilling
the integrative role of national schools.
Another
would be to make integration an explicit objective, and reward those schools
that achieve the goal, as with increased funding. The fact that they attract a
cross section of Malaysians suggests that they are doing something right. Rewarding
them would encourage others to follow suit. Conceivably we could have state-supported
Swahili schools if they were to attract a broad spectrum of Malaysians.
At
the same time schools with segregated enrollment would lose state support,
whether that segregation is based on race, religion, or language. That applies
to Tamil as well as Tahfiz schools. That does not mean they cannot exist, only
that they would not get taxpayers’ money. The state should not condone much
less encourage or support segregation under any guise.
Next: Deficiency
of Content
Adapted from the author’s book, Liberating The Malay
Mind, published by ZI Publications, Petaling Jaya, 2013. The second
edition was released in January 2016.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home