Liberation Through Science
M. Bakri Musa
www.bakrimusa.com
The low level of science literacy among Malaysian
students, most acute among Malays, is well documented. Science is important for
two reasons. The first is obvious; nearly all the advances responsible for our
material comfort, improvements in health and life, as well as our comprehension
of our physical and social world are due to science. It behooves us to make our
future citizens science literate. Before pursuing that, I will dispose of the
second reason.
This
second reason is less obvious but more compelling. Science presents a unique
way of looking at the world and an approach towards problem solving. Hamka once
said that Allah gave us two Korans; one He revealed to Prophet Muhammad,
s.a.w., the other, this wonderful universe. We have a responsibility to study
both Korans. With the first, He gave us an exceptional teacher in the person of
Prophet Muhammad, s.a.w; with the second, He has equipped us with akal,
intellect, an attribute unique only unto humans.
Hamka’s
two Korans metaphor is the best reconciliation of faith and reason, of
revelation and experimentation.
Using
akal or rational thinking is what science is all about. It is based on
empirical evidence, not speculation or philosophizing. You observe the world
around you, make a tentative hypothesis to explain what you have observed, and
then test it through experimentation or its predictive accuracy. In many
respects, the scientific mind is like that of a child; always curious and always
learning, as well as constantly formulating, testing, and re-formulating its
hypothesis of reality.
That
at least is the ideal of science. In the real world however, things are not
necessarily so neat or elegant. Scientists too are subject to the usual human
foibles and narrow-mindedness. In collecting data, scientists are like everyone
else, subject to “confirmation bias.” When the data do not support the theory,
the usual reaction is to blame the experiment and or experiemnter, especially
when he is not from the establishment and the prevailing theory has been
postulated by someone eminent and in authority.
In his book The Mismeasure of Man, the late Stephen Jay Gould
debunked the 18th Century “science” of craniometry, where by
measuring the size and conformation of human skulls one could classify the
various races and purportedly make inferences on their intellectual capacity.
Gould made the singular point that to embark on such an enquiry one must have a
priori belief in the different intellectual capabilities of the various
races, and that those differences in turn are related to skull size and
conformation; hence the measurements.
Subsequent
empirical studies debunked that thesis. That is the beauty of science; the
certitudes of today could be the butt of tomorrow’s jokes. As for skull
conformations, consider the flat back of the heads of Malays for example. That
has more to do with cultural child-rearing practices. We put our babies to
sleep on their backs; Europeans on their tummies, with the face turned sideways
to avoid being smothered. Incidentally, today’s pediatricians advise mothers to
avoid that practice as it is associated with a high incidence of Sudden Infant
Death Syndrome. Score one for traditional Malay culture!
Returning
to the first rationale, making citizens science literate and mathematically
competent is a practical necessity in today’s world, unless you wish your
society to remain backward. The OECD’s Program for International Students
Assessment (PISA) shows that a nation’s economic development is correlated
with, and in fact due in large part to the scientific and mathematical skills
as well as the language and critical thinking ability of its workers. All other
criteria, such as the amount of money expended on education, class size, or
years in the classroom are irrelevant. By these other criteria Egypt is on par
with South Korea, but the economies and social development of the two countries
could not be more different. The Koreans have much superior science and
mathematical skills. That in turn translates into their superior economic and
social developments.
The
deficiency with science teaching in Malaysia lies with both approach and
content. The subject content is totally unrelated to the pupils’ environment,
making it difficult to capture their interest. The loaded national syllabus
prevents the teacher from exploring the children’s natural world. A school may
be on the beach but the pupils learn nothing about the tides and inter-tidal marine
environment throughout their school years; likewise, students living near
rivers or deltas would be totally ignorant of their riparian ecology.
For
many reasons, primarily financial, experiments–the essence of science–are now
mostly demonstrated to but rarely repeated by students. Now in a misuse of
computers, those experiments are simulated digitally, teaching students that
real life is as predictable as the simplistic software engineers’ algorithm would
have it.
Very
few schools have programs related to their immediate environment. My old school
in Kuala Pilah way back in the 1950s had a weather station that collected data
on rainfall, wind, and daily temperatures. Our job was to present the data in a
variety of formats, typically graphs and tables. We were able to compare our
data with what was written in the textbooks. Likewise, during my primary school
I remember doing experiments on seed germination using corn and green peas,
being ready examples of mono and di-cotyledons, as well as observing the
metamorphosis of banana leaf moths, an ubiquitous insect.
In
California, my son’s elementary school science project had the pupils examine
owl pellets and from there deduce the birds’ diet. In my grandson’s Grade One
class, the children did experiments with oil, water and cork to demonstrate the
concept of density and buoyancy. There are literally thousands of such
tangible, easily performed experiments to stimulate the students’ interest in
science. Those exercises may not be in the syllabus or be tested in the final
examinations, but they will sustain the students’ interest, and more
importantly, help them absorb the essence of the scientific method.
Next: The
Trap of Mono Lingualism
Adapted from the author’s book, Liberating
The Malay Mind, published by ZI Publications, Petaling Jaya, 2013.
The second edition was released in January 2016
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home